#Civil war hospital tents professional

Such suggestions relative to the situation, construction and economy of the hospitals, and to the police of the camps, as may appear necessary for the benefit and comfort of the sick, and the good of the service.ħ. They will examine the case books, prescription and diet books, and ascertain the nature of diseases which may have prevailed, and their probable causes recommend the best method of prevention, and also make Medical Directors, Chief Surgeons of Divisions, and Senior Surgeons of Brigades will inspect the hospitals of their commands, and see that the rules and regulations are enforced, and the duties of the Surgeons and Assistant Surgeons are properly performed.Ħ. A brigade will be under the general medical charge of the Senior Surgeon of Brigade, who will not be relieved from regimental duty.ĥ. A division will have a medical officer assigned, on the recommendation of the Medical Director, as Chief Surgeon or the senior medical officer of the division, on the same recommendation, will be relieved from regimental duty, and placed in general charge as Chief Surgeon of Division.Ĥ.

An army corps or military department will have a medical officer assigned as Medical Director, who will have the general control of the medical officers and hospitals.ģ. All communications from medical officers, which require his action, will be made directly to him.Ģ.

#Civil war hospital tents professional

The Surgeon General is charged with the administrative details of the Medical Department the government of hospitals the regulation of the duties of the medical officers, issuing orders and instructions relating to their professional duties and the employment of acting medical officers when needed. Adjusted for inflation, this was roughly equal to the entire federal budget during the administration of President James Buchanan (1857–61).1. In an age in which few Americans made $2 a day, $350 million was equivalent to the total wartime income of one hundred thousand households. No other single project, in either government or business, involved the expenditure of such an enormous sum. This sum amounted to nearly one-third of the total of over $1 billion that the Quartermaster's Department as a whole spent to equip the Union army. The magnitude of the procurement project was unprecedented: in four years, these five officers alone paid contractors and civilian employees $350 million. Louis-were indispensable adjuncts to the Union war effort. During the Civil War, the supply depots in which they worked-in Philadelphia, New York, Cincinnati, and St. army entrusted with military procurement. Each was a high-ranking officer in the Quartermaster's Department, a bureau of the U.S. Yet in certain respects they were five of the most important government officials in the nineteenth-century United States. Dickerson, Thomas Swords, or Stewart Van Vliet. history textbook mentions Robert Allen, George H. Featuring relatively low‐capital production arrangements, large numbers of women workers, and powerful mercantile intermediaries who linked manufacturers and army purchasing agents, the Civil War tent business is an example that challenges traditional accounts of the economic foundations of nineteenth‐century military capability. tent industry, the leading military contractors were mercantile firms, which stood at the center of disintegrated production and distribution networks.

This article, which describes the tent industry in the United States during the Civil War, suggests that many military enterprises of the period were characterized by an industrial dynamic that was relatively extensive rather than intensive. In fact, weapons and ships accounted for a relatively small fraction of all the goods and services consumed by nineteenth‐century armed forces. Because most histories of military‐industrial relations have rested on the examples of arms production and shipbuilding, balanced accounts of military procurement and technologies during the nineteenth century are difficult to find.